Matt McCutchen wrote: > Are you comparing git to Mercurial or to a centralized VCS? Both. Git is just a PITA in its own league, but DVCSes as a whole are a broken (*) and unhelpful (inherently hard to use) concept. (*) e.g. because of the strong reliance on hashes, which can make the whole thing break down in the event of a hash collision, and which make commit IDs nonsequential and unpredictable > Some of the complexity is intrinsic to distributed VCS and has to be > weighed against the significant benefits to people who build custom > packages, like me. I don't see how dist-git makes it any easier to build customized packages. If you really want a local git mirror of a centralized repository, you can also use git-cvs, git-svn or the like. For SVN, SVK is also a nice solution. All this dist-git migration has brought us is chaos, a much higher barrier to entry and much harder work for existing packagers. (And yes, I've also tried to make these points BEFORE the migration, but nobody listened.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel