Hi Jeremy,
Jeremy Katz åé:
On Mon, 2004-03-08 at 17:29, Christian Rose wrote:
Ok, so why someone seems to have reverted all string changes that have
happened the last months in anaconda beats me.
Hrmm? I haven't touched the .pot file recently (since test1-ish).
Granted, I _should_ push what's current but I haven't recently. There
haven't been really many changes at all, though. Hrmm... actually, I
think I might see what happened -- it looks like I somehow missed
committing the changed anaconda.pot file when I updated stuff and then
sarahs remerged stuff last night.
Oops! I thought pot is always the *master*... I thought I was doing the
right thing by keeping all po files consistent with pot files! All
translators are very keen to keep up with the master files. The current
status page showed that the total number of strings across all languages
are greatly varied. If we can't be sure the pot files are most up2date
how can we be sure the po files will be most up2date?
Ugh. I'll clean this up tonight after I get home as best as I can.
It's going to require going back to the state of things before Sarah's
merging last night, remerge with what's in devel CVS and then push
again. Which means that anything from today will be lost :/ I _think_
that's probably the best plan, though (you can always then go back a
revision to before my merging).
Would it be easier just to push the updated pot files to
rhlinux.redhat.com each time when they are updated? Who wants to work on
outdated files?
Yet another reason why I need to finish getting to where I can put
anaconda's CVS repository in general on rhlinux.redhat.com and just be
done with this nonsense of duplicate CVS repositories for translations
:-)
That would make a lot of sense to have one single CVS repositories. Is
this the case for all other packages as well? Can we have automatica
sync if we must maintain two CVS repositories?
Regards,
Sarah
