Jesse Keating wrote, at 07/31/2010 11:36 AM +9:00: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/30/10 7:13 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >> This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received >> massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that >> I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have >> to do for this? >> > > Yes, you can ignore this. It was my fault. Tomorrow a better compose > should go through. > Thank you. Now another question for tag issue. Currently how is it going about the inheritance of "dist-rawhide" tag? About pygtk2 618944 bug I saw Toshio rebuilt pygtk2-0.17.0-7.fc14, however I firstly thought that this new pkg was not rebuild for rawhide yet because: [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f14-build pygtk2 Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- pygtk2-2.17.0-7.fc14 dist-f14-override toshio [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-rawhide pygtk2 Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- pygtk2-2.17.0-6.fc14 dist-f14 dmalcolm So I tried to rebuild pygtk2 also on "rawhide" but it failed with koji's reporting that "it already exists". Actually: [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f15 pygtk2 Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- pygtk2-2.17.0-7.fc15 dist-f15 toshio Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
