Hi, > Delete these fields if you derive an existing package. Mention the > previous packager's name in a changelog entry. > > "Packager:" is not used, > "Vendor:" is set automatically by the build system. > > > I think this should be explained in the QA. > > It is not related to package quality. It derives from what you see that a package of quality shouldn't have a Packager nor a Vendor field. It seems to me the kind of helpfull rule to avoid having to take a decision or ask on a mailing list, similar with the advice to change Copyright to Licence. I had a look at the spec files to try to make an opinion from the examples, however finding that a field shouldn't be present would have required to look at all the spec files. Pat
