Rahul Sundaram (metherid@xxxxxxxxx) said: > dramatically. Even in this thread, I have talked about a standard way of > accessing repositories to make it easier for users, asking remi to make > Firefox 4 available in repo etc which has nothing to do with RPM Fusion. Example 1: Warning - paraphrasing: <spot> We can't have an rpmfusion alias. <drago01> Not even with a disclaimer? <spot> No. <you> Well, how about if we do this other thing? Implication: your goal is to get more people on rpmfusion, and you want to take any legal loopholes you can find to get there Example 2: <you> "To be direct, if [a] fedoracommunity.org [site] wiki documents the steps to use RPM Fusion, is that ok according to Red Hat Legal?" Implication: your goal is to get more people on rpmfusion, and you want to take any legal loopholes you can find to get there And in followup, (paraphrased): <stickster> As long as the fedoracomunity.org subdomain points to space not managed by the Fedora Project, we cannot control it. <you> can I then have a mediawiki connected to FAS so I can do this? Implication: your goal is to get more people on rpmfusion, and you want to take any legal loopholes you can find to get there, or get Fedora to help with this. (And you persisted in arguing with spot after he said no to this, too.) I don't deny that you do a lot of good for the project, or even that you do good work in documenting patented restrictions, etc. But in *this particular point* (enabling easier/automated/semi-automated access to forbidden items), the constant pushing reminds me of nothing more than a 9-year old attempting to come up with ways they can have more cookies for dessert after they've been told no. Saying no to each particular variant is tiring. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
