On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:57:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 07/28/2010 05:47 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> On 07/28/2010 04:22 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote >>>> The FSF drafted up the four freedoms and it's not offtopic, we're >>>> discussing Firefox4 and the fact that we won't be able to make >>>> changes to it to fix it without their permission. >>> There is no specific non-upstream change that Firefox maintainers in >>> Fedora want to do and hence it is irrelevant to this thread which is >>> merely about integration of Firefox in Fedora 14 which requires no >>> patches. >> Wrong, users of the KDE spin would LOVE to have OpenSUSE's patches to >> integrate it _better_ with KDE. > > What does that have to do with this thread? As long as the patches are > not upstream, Firefox in Fedora won't have it. Period. > Is Red Hat Legal just more careful than Novell's legal department? Otherwise, how is it that they ship Firefox with custom patches (and call it Firefox) and we don't.. Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | GPG key ID: 78884778 Jabber: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | IRC: hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
