Re: (lack of) maintainership of epiphany?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 19 July 2010 5:44:21 am pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 23:28 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> >> 2010/7/7 Andreas Tunek <andreas.tunek@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:59 +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> >> > I wonder about the maintainer ship of epiphany. The ownership of it
> >> >> > is gecko-maint but in none of the current versions of fedora is
> >> >> > epiphany gecko based and of the 18 other maintainers not a single
> >> >> > person is on the bugzilla watch ACL. There's a bug that was
> >> >> > introduced at some point in the F-13 time frame where it crashes
> >> >> > on all the machines I attempt to use it on when it first tries to
> >> >> > load a page, there's quite a few dupes. I'm really surprised that
> >> >> > no one has picked this up.
> >> >> 
> >> >> I thought I had, but it may have been something I filed under 'poke
> >> >> someone about later when I'm not so busy'...
> >> >> 
> >> >> To me it would seem to make sense for the desktop team to own it,
> >> >> since it's a part of GNOME.
> >> >> --
> >> > 
> >> > I can't use Epiphany at all in F12 due to this bug:
> >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592685
> >> > 
> >> > Haven't had any problems in F13 yet though...
> >> 
> >> Now I get problems in F13, see
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603358
> > 
> > FWIW, it looks like a WebKitGTK bug when launching pretty much any
> > plugin. Best to try and reproduce the problem with another WebKitGTK
> > browser, and update the bug with actual reproducer instructions.
> 
> Its certainly related to plugins. I don't have flash installed but I
> did have java installed. Now I don't and it doesn't crash. It worked
> fine with the original F-13 release so its regressed along the way but
> it does work with no plugins OK.

Possibly because of this[1] update?

> Peter

Ryan

[1]: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-
openjdk-1.6.0.0-39.b18.fc13

-- 
Ryan Rix
== http://hackersramblings.wordpress.com | http://rix.si/ ==
== http://rix.si/page/contact/ if you need a word         ==

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux