On Wed, 14.07.10 21:41, Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Lennart Poettering (mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together > > for the various services of our default install. I think they give an > > indication how simple these files actually are: > > > > http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-units/ > > > > Please have a look and if you have any questions just ask! > > Re: cups, if the entire point is to reserve the sockets early with > systemd, why would portrelease still be required? You are right. portrelease is not necessary anymore if socket activation is used for the repsective services. Does anyone know what other services (besides CUPS) currently use portreserve? Might be worth spending my time on patching those for socket actrivation, too, so that we can get rid of portreserve this way. One less daemon to start! > Bill, probably missing something Nope. You are right. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
