Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 21:41 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Re: cups, if the entire point is to reserve the sockets early with
> systemd, why would portrelease still be required?

Also, re: this comment:

# This is evil stuff. CUPS should use proper enumeration instead of
# retriggering these devices. CUPS folks, please fix this, otherwise Kay will
# come after you!
ExecStartPost=/sbin/udevadm trigger --subsystem-match=usb --attr-match=bInterfaceClass=07 --attr-match=bInterfaceSubClass=01
ExecStartPost=/sbin/udevadm trigger --subsystem-match=usb --property-match=DEVNAME=/dev/usb/lp*

Kay actually suggested doing this in the first place IIRC.  We have udev
triggers for when printers are connected/disconnected, but the triggers
require cupsd to be running.  The situation the above lines are to deal
with is that a new printer is connected at boot, so the (earlier) udev
trigger had to abort because cupsd wasn't running.

Tim.
*/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux