On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:27:27 +0200 > Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Also they are about the "important packages", > > which is a subset of critical path. > > Superset. :) In any case, the items mentioned there should be > implemented. Bodhi calls them all 'critical path' so perhaps we should > change to do that there too. Yes, superset. If the important packages and critical path packages are the same and handled the same in any way, then the term "import packages" should imho vanish and never be used again. The inflation of different terms for the same thing is imho a major problem in the Fedora docs in general. :-( > > And the policy says that it is > > not yet live. > > I have updated the page. > > Does it look clear now? Re-wording or tweaks very welcome. I tried to make it more consistent. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgpeA4GIO155p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
