On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >>> On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
> >>>> It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
> >>>> privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
> >>>
> >>> Incorrect. Anyone in the provenpackagers group has access to almost all
> >>> packages.
> >>
> >> The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers.
> >>
> >> They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
> >> Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
> >>
> > Ralf, you need to stop repeating this particular line when I have repeatedly
> > told you that working for Red Hat is not the rationale.
> Toshio, I am tired of you (==Toshio) not wanting recognize what you (==
> RH) are did: Granting widest privileges to people who, never, repeat
> never would have been granted these privileges if they were not @RH.
>
In infrastructure when people have mass requests to put in we try to
complete them if they seem reasonable and if they come from people who
have the authority to grant it. He did the work because he was asked to,
as would I have. The infrastructure team is a service oriented team. It
wasn't Toshio's job to decide who had access to what and AFAIK, he didn't
make those decisions he just did the work. You're shooting the messenger
not that you care.
-Mike
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
