On 07/02/2010 01:58 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: >>> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote: >>> >>>> IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone >>>> with commit access updating packages in Rawhide >>> >>> Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans >>> to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons >>> for not upgrading the package. Just ask! >> >> I think you are spot-on with this comment. There probably wouldn't be >> such a discussion if the (proven)packager simply stated his intentions >> to the package maintainer. >> > > That doesn't really scale, on a single package basis yeah maybe, Exactly. The perl-5.12.x rebuild involved ca. 1500 packages ;) > You get mails from CVS, its all in version control, if you disagree with > what they did, back it out, state in the spec what they did wrong. Exactly. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
