On 07/02/2010 01:55 PM, Léon Keijser wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote: >> >> >>> IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone >>> with commit access updating packages in Rawhide >>> >> Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans >> to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons >> for not upgrading the package. Just ask! >> > I think you are spot-on with this comment. There probably wouldn't be > such a discussion if the (proven)packager simply stated his intentions > to the package maintainer. > > Léon > > I wrote to perl-sig that we are working on perl5.12 update, which means rebuild of all packages. Also I sent list of failed packages. Some of them were fixed by maintainers, some of them were fixed by me or other people from perl-sig. I suppose every perl maintainer read perl-sig mailing list or see changelog, which explained the change. Marcela -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
