-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 6/30/10 12:29 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Will Woods <wwoods@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 15:04 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Yes I can. I have two critpath packages that are in testing with >>> security bugs, both pretty small and easy to test, and both still have >>> karma zero. That seems to me to be adequate proof that there's not the >>> manpower out there to do this. > >> Have you actually asked anyone to test it? Or even considered >> *mentioning the names of the packages* so maybe someone here could help? > > I mentioned libtiff in my first comment in this thread. The other one > is libpng. But in any case, are maintainers supposed to have to scare > up testers on their own? Especially for packages that are supposed to > be so central as to be critpath? If there aren't testers coming out of > the woodwork, this scheme is doomed to failure. > > regards, tom lane It worked just fine when F13 branched before F13 released. We're putting even more resources into it now, ergo it should work just as fine. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwrqMEACgkQ4v2HLvE71NUDxgCgpPyHdKSQi0XVng1fc3HGCEzg gqEAniEOlhRJrctTk4iKOqrfCz21y4bC =GLK5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
