On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 14:28:40 -0500, Michael wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > A_copy_ to users' list would suffice. Test updates are relevant to the > > users - and the build reports are sort of an early warning system about > > what updates will likely be unleashed. It's especially relevant to the > > users, when the updates aren't tested prior to entering the stable > > updates repository. And so far, there is no QA team that tests them. > > Once they have entered the updates repo, regular users are supposed to > > install them, and then it's too late. > > A copy of broken deps should be obsolete when Adam and friends are > allowed to use AutoQA to prevent this sort of thing from hitting stable. > Should you even worry about it? I refer to the "Fedora N updates-testing report" not the broken deps report. Test updates are in need of much more testing than just the depcheck. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
