Re: Missing dependency that is already installed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 21:32 -0400, Mohammed Morsi wrote:
> Hey just to follow up, the mistake was on my part I believe. I was using 
> the ancient ruby-activerecord package, which will soon be retired as it 
> has long since been replaced w/ rubygem-activerecord.
> 
> I'm still not sure why ruby-activerecord didn't work, especially with 
> rubygem-activesupport installed, but trying this again w/ 
> rubygem-activerecord results in a successful build / install.

Two people gave you the correct answer in the thread. It's because of
the epoch. A package with an EVR of 1:2.3.8 does not satisfy a
requirement of 2.3.8.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux