On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 11:59 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/26/2010 11:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > Clearly the maintainer did not allow sufficient time for testing here; > > there's a grand 4 hour window between the update being 'pushed to > > testing' and 'submitted to stable'. That probably wasn't long enough for > > it even to hit any public mirrors. > > > > Can the maintainers please explain why they did this? We need that > answer before looking at AutoQA IMO. History seems to suggest that maintainers are *always* going to submit updates that cause dependency problems, so it seems sensible to look at handling the situation after submission as well as trying to make people _not_ submit such updates. I believe the maintainer said in the submission that he simply didn't catch the ABI change: "Oh, I see, I didn't notice this change earlier. It was changed in http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution-data- server/commit/?h=gnome-2-30&id=9930a9602 " -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
