Re: Evolution update in F13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 6/25/10 10:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Until AutoQA is in place to tackle this, the obvious option is for there
>> to be a process improvement whereby whoever's doing stable update pushes
>> at least gets notified if a package has received negative karma since
>> the submission. I think we discussed something similar on -devel last
>> time this happened. Not sure if there's a ticket, or how hard that would
>> be to implement.
>
> Likely the easiest thing to do is on the client side we use, filter any
> update requests that have too negative of karma.  It would have caught
> this issue. They can be displayed for a releng person to further
> investigate.

That would only work if the script that does the push to stable (as
opposed to processing the request to push to stable) checks if any
negative karma has appeared since the request has happened.

I believe that a deps autoqa is still a good idea for stable releases.

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux