On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The fact that you have to use those sed lines shows that there's something > wrong somewhere as we normally don't need them to produce rpath-free > binaries if we're using Fedora or Red Hat libtool. Since you have the > ability to commit upstream, please fix glib2's build scripts. What do you mean by "Fedora libtool"? Ohh...I see, we have a patch which does something...that's not entirely clear to me at first glance, and there's no comment, or upstream bug link. As far as using that, note the glib2 tarballs are actually typically created on an Ubuntu system. So... > If you can't figure out how to do that, you can get me a link to your srpm > that shows the issue and I'll take a look. Sure: http://fedorapeople.org/~walters/glib2-2.24.1-1.4.20100625git7cdc592a.fc13.src.rpm (but it really seems easier to me to just fedora-cvs glib2 and inspect it...) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
