On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:03:08 -0400, Stephen wrote: > Django 1.2.1 was recently pushed to stable in Fedora 13. This should not > have been done without discussion on this list. Just to understand what has happened here: In three weeks, nobody has added any comment to the update in bodhi. Has it gone unnoticed by all the people who depend on Django? > Django 1.2 breaks API > with Django 1.1, resulting in breaking at least two Django-based > packages in Fedora: Transifex and ReviewBoard. > > ReviewBoard has an available upstream version that will work with either > (and I will now have to package early), but Transifex has no plans to > support Django 1.2 in the immediate future (since 1.1 will remain > supported upstream for some time). > > Furthermore, these issues were already discussed in the bodhi update for > the EPEL5 version of this package, and it was decided that the upgrade > was not sensible there either. When? Where? Am I right in assuming that the bodhi update has been _deleted_ by the packager? > After that discussion, it seems to me > that it would have been sensible to raise a discussion about pushing > this update into a stable Fedora. (Rawhide was fine, as it would have > given Transifex several months to add compatibility). -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
