On 06/20/2010 07:00 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: > On 06/20/2010 12:22 PM, Jonathan Steffan wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: >> >>> The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the >>> legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package. >>> >> With zope 2.12 supporting py2.6, I think we might actually have a shot >> at making this work. However, immediately off the bat if we stick 2.12.x >> into "zope" what happens to grok? What packages are going to break? Too >> many things need zope 2.x so updating the "zope" namespace to zope 3 >> would break a lot of good software. What happens to plone? Do we just >> ditch Plone 3 and only support Plone 4?[2] >> > This is really worrying. > For our own sanity we are going to have to make some tough choices. I don't think we can please everyone. I do however, think we can please most people. Nathaniel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
