Hello, 2010-06-11 18:44 keltezéssel, Doug Warner írta: > On 06/11/2010 05:32 AM, Peter Czanik wrote: > >> 2010-06-10 15:10 keltezéssel, Rahul Sundaram írta: >> >>> On 06/10/2010 04:45 PM, Peter Czanik wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598961 >>>> What is the procedure, if there is no response to such a bugzilla request? Is there maintainer a timeout, like with FreeBSD? Or I have to wait patiently until something happens? I was suggested, that as "provenpackager" I could do this, but as I don't have any Fedora packages, it is a no-go. Or could an other "provenpackager" do it for me? Updated sources, prepared by me, are also in bugzilla... >>>> Bye, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers >>> >>> >> OK, created a 'non-responsive maintainer' bug: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603012 >> >> >>> Yes, a proven packager could also do it for you. >>> >>> >> Could, but I start to have some doubts, as this thread is over a month >> old, and contains URL to updated package, which was never downloaded... >> So, the three weeks countdown just started, and I hope, that either the >> maintainer will respond or I can take the package over. Well, actuall >> I'd be more happy with the original maintainer or a proven packager, as >> I have some packaging experience, but no Fedora infrastructure experience... >> > I responded to the original bug and closed the non-responsive maintainer bug. > > The updated package was published as a tgz file which made it difficult to see > what was being changed in the spec file; a link to the new spec file or patch > would be much easier to see what's going on. > Sorry, I just wanted to help by providing it. I don't really now the Fedora development process yet, so I looked at other bugzilla entries, and found that people provide spec files or srpm-s for new or updated packages. > To be honest, maintaining syslog-ng (while I use it all the time) is a very > tiring process; there isn't much "support" for multiple sysloggers in Fedora > and it was a real pain to get everyone cooperating to make them not have to > conflict with each other. I can see why the previous maintainers left the > syslog-ng package go unmaintained now as well. > > I'll try to work on getting this package updated as I do still prefer > syslog-ng's syntax over rsyslog even if it has other problems. > Thank you. Please let me know, if you need any help or information from syslong-ng upstream. Bye, CzP -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
