Hi Jesse, On 11 June 2010 22:57, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 17:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >> >> Is it necessary to do fedpkg clone ? >> Or can regular git be used ? >> >> > Not necessary at all. The current url is > pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/<package> and that works with git:// and > ssh://. One advantage to using fedpkg clone is that if you like the > current directory layout where each release is a subdir, you can do > 'fedpkg clone --branches' and you'll get that layout. You can also do > fedpkg clone -b <branch> and get a checkout of the specific branch > listed. By no means is fedpkg required for the clones and commits, but > it is a convenience that some will like to use, and will likely be the > "documented" way of doing things. I'm really keen to see this come off as I think pretty much everyone is and look forward to the day when we all bid cvs goodbye. Would it not be saner to extend git through a plugin to provide fedora-specific stuff rather than use a new, separate command like fedpkg? Might help the migration if people understand that they are essentially using git with a few fedora options instead. Just a thought. Regards -- Christopher Brown -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
