On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:39:52 -0400, James wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 19:23 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 13:10:10 -0400, James wrote: > > > which is to say you have: > > > > > > 1. pkgA-1 contains two files: /usr/bin/A and /usr/bin/A-blah > > > > > > 2. You now want to have pkgA-2 and pkgA-blah-2, which each contain a > > > single file. > > > > > > 3. You want anyone who had pkgA-1 to have both pkgA-2 and pkgA-blah-2 > > > (because that's what they had before). > > > > > > ...if at the end of the "split" you want "yum install pkgA" to install > > > pkgA-blah (or vice versa), then it's not _just_ a split and you probably > > > want to use a Requires (as you would if pkgA-2/pkgA-blah-2 were the > > > first versions). You can do this instead of the obsoletes, but I don't > > > see the point. > > > > If at the end of the split user does "yum install pkgA-blah-2", this > > erases pkgA-1 ... unless pkgA-blah-2 strictly requires pkgA-2, which > > is not always desired. > > And if the user never has pkgA-1 installed, and does "install > pkgA-blah" then that's all they'll get. If you modify the scenario, we will talk past eachother. The scenario is: 1. User has pkgA-1 installed. 2. Packager performs a split and introduces at least one new subpkg, so: pkgA-blah-2 and pkgA-2. 3. User follows some documentation and runs "yum install pkgA-blah" to add something. 4. Package "pkgA" is erased (obsoleted) => bug. > To put it another way when the > user first installed pkgA-1 they could have wanted: Nothing else than "pkgA-1", because user cannot foresee the split of either the package contents OR the package dependencies. Or user simply relied on the distribution's installer to install packages. > 1. What pkgA-2 and pkgA-blah-2 provide. > > 2. What pkgA-2 provides. > > 3. What pkgA-blah-2 provides. > > ...but they got #1 because that was all pkgA-1 provided. Now there is a > package split and the user can choose any of #1, #2 or #3. > If you only want them to be able to choose between #1 and #2 (or #1 and > #3) then you need some kind of requires _as well_. But that's because > you have some requirement _as well_ as just a package split. That isn't what I refer to. For some splits you don't have a requirement. See e.g. a real-world example, where installing/adding a Nagios plugin package removed Nagios because of competing Obsoletes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/590709#c13 All is well (including the self-Obsoletes) if sub-packages OR separate add-on packages, which obsolete a package, also depend on that same package. Where that isn't true, competing Obsoletes => playing with fire. As explained. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel