On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Did we really need to > take some raw numbers that Luke was kind enough to put together and make it > into some sort of QA methods holy war? The lesson here is that for data mining to make sense there must a consensus understanding of the question being asked. I'm not sure we have that here. I think the numbers are interesting in showing that bodhi can be used as a metric tool.. but I'm not sure we have consensus about what questions to be asking it. The strong reaction to the interpretive prose is just a symptom of that. Luke is asking bodhi questions about the trends of participation. I think some people have misread that as surrogate for a broader question about overall package quality. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
