On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 08:38 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 06/09/2010 05:00 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > > >> Any idea how to fix this? We should probably add a section to the > >> packaging guidelines, on how to migrate to noarch subpackages without > >> breaking upgrade paths. > >> > > Or just not support users who have unneeded multilib packages installed. > > Installing only those multilib packages that are actually needed has been > > the default since Fedora 9, if people set up yum to pull in everything as > > multilib, that's their problem. > > As long as yum offers it as a option, bugs must be fixed. Three minor points, about the original bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600969 1. It has nothing to do with multilib. 2. It works fine now for all users updating llvm via. a repo (like updates or updates-testing). 3. It is fixed upstream. -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.28 http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumBenchmarks http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumHistory -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
