On 09/06/10 11:06, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2010/6/9 Chen Lei<supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> But in this case, the obsoletes seems excessive, since >> pidgin-evolution already depends on pidgin. If pidgin-evolution don't >> depend on pidgin, the obsoletes is a must, without it pidgin will be >> replaced by pidgin-evolution. > > If it pidgin-evolution was previously in main package, then this > obsoletes is required. W/o this requires users may suffer from missing > functionality after upgrade. > > Briefly: > > * We need to split off p.-e, from pidgin Fine. > * We need to install both of them while upgrading (Obsoletes in > pidgin-evo) in order not to loose functionality. The Obsoletes: in pidgin-evo causes pidgin-evo to be pulled in, which is fine. The package should obsolete pidgin packages prior to the split but not the ones after the split. > * We need to not erase main pidgin (Obsoletes in pidgin) Not needed if pidgin-evo depends on pidgin itself - the regular dependency mechanism should pull the main pidgin package in. And since the new pidgin package is versioned later than the split, it's no longer obsoleted by the pidgin-evo subpackage. Does that not work? Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
