Re: llvm case study: yum's handling of newly-converted noarch subpackages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

>
> I don't buy your argument and trashing anyone's opinion you disagree
> with you as "crap" and "nonsense" is hardly going to help make your
> case.   Excluding a dependency and setting a multi_lib option is hardly
> the same thing.  Anyway,  I am pretty sure none of the yum developers
> are going to agree with your view point either.  Again,  it in our
> responsibility towards users to include options that we can support or
> mark them as unsupported.
>

a suggestion.

Since neither of you speak for any of the yum developers, please stop 
doing so either implicitly or explicitly.

kthxbai

-sv

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux