2010/6/9 Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:21 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:10 -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: >> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 00:56 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> > > I will work with Ankur Sinha and probably do this for Rawhide in the >> > > next couple of days. Peter Gordon, let me know if you have any objections >> > >> > This sounds good to me - please go ahead with your changes. >> > >> > (Apologies about the unavailability over the past several weeks. Final >> > projects and trips with family/friends have consumed most of my time. >> > I'm back and ready to rock some Fedora packages, though! ^_~) >> >> hey, >> >> I've made some kinda spec splitting the package into sub packages. >> Please have a look at the spec[1]. It builds in mock. The build logs etc >> are here[2] >> >> Please let me know if(when) you think up of changes ;) >> >> regards, >> Ankur >> >> [1] http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/deluge.spec >> [2] http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/deluge/ > > Updated spec to handle conflicts etc. Hope thats how its to be done. > > regards, > Ankur > > > -- I think image subpackage is not needed, maybe it can merged to -common subpackage, also if you should not provide Provides: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} or Provides: %{name}-flags = %{version}-%{release} in spec. Obseletes is enough to provide a sane upgrade path, Provides is needed for renaming a package, but it's not suitable in the case of spliting one package into several subpackages. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
