Im not going to argue anymore. I should have realised that trying to change something like this is stupid and impossible. Its probably been hammered out in other user-groups. > >That dont cut it for me. Two distinct kernels one with SELinux and one > >without. I do have a reason why I said this and it wasnt because of any comspiracy theories. I didnt make myself clear. Im not going to say anymore. Dropped. --- "Mike A. Harris" <mharris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, James Harrison wrote: > > >Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:03:48 -0800 (PST) > >From: James Harrison <jamesaharrisonuk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >List-Id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core > > <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com> > >Subject: Re: Fedora Core 2 Test 2 - delayed > > > > > >> >Boot with selinux=0, and the SELinux code is disabled. > >That dont cut it for me. Two distinct kernels one with SELinux and one > >without. > > Feel free to reconfigure the kernel .config in the kernel src.rpm > and rebuild your own kernel with SElinux disabled. The > likelyhood of us adding an additional kernel with SElinux totally > removed from it is very slim. Every kernel included in the OS > increases the maintenance of the kernel by that much more, which > costs us a large amount of engineering and QA time. > > Hopefully your own customized kernel will cut it for you. ;o) > > -- > Mike A. Harris ftp://people.redhat.com/mharris > OS Systems Engineer - XFree86 maintainer - Red Hat > > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list ===== James Harrison __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
