Re: Inclusion user rpm macros file in spec

["Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

30.05.2010 21:19, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) пишет:

21.05.2010 20:58, Panu Matilainen пишет:

On Fri, 21 May 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:

  

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
    

I think because macroses should be included before it processed as shell
script.
Is there some variant of %include or similar?
      

AFAIK, no. E.g. in kde-filesystem, we end up defining things twice, once for
the specfile itself and once for the .macros file:
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/kde-filesystem/devel/kde-filesystem.spec?revision=1.49&view=markup
    

And neither of you actually thought to try whether %include works? :D
Hint: it does, in spec files.

 	- Panu -
  

Thanks for the answers.
Panu, you are sure? I try, and rpmbuild encountered error - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597835

Sorry for the answer to themselves.
Now, when bug fixed and rpm hit rawhide I can continue test it suggestion. And it does not work on strange manner - it is not produce any error, but also does nothing!
So, in minimal spec file was attached in the bug I have now in %prep:
%include %{SOURCE0}
%{testmacros}
exit 102

And at build time no TEST appeared:
$ LANG=C rpmbuild -ba test.spec
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/pasha/SOFT/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ exit 102
error: Bad exit status from /home/pasha/SOFT/rpmbuild/BUILD/_tmp/rpm-tmp.ECc7qg (%prep)
    Bad exit status from /home/pasha/SOFT/rpmbuild/BUILD/_tmp/rpm-tmp.ECc7qg (%prep)

Please, can you more describe how it should work? What is prerequisites? May be link on detailed explanation?

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel