Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 04:43:58AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chen Lei wrote:
> > I found the maintainer violates fedora package/naming guideline many
> > times, we need a people to persuade him to obey those guideline.
> 
> IMHO we need to unsponsor him and orphan his packages. There are way too 
> many guideline violations and bizarre nonstandard stuff in his packages.

I think that this would be a huge mistake. Enrico is a very talented 
packagers he generally is ahead of his time. I was myself sometimes annoyed 
by the peculiarities of his packages, but he always comply to guidelines.

I think that pushing talented packagers that don't think exactly like
the median fedora packager and show some originality is not healthy.

-- 
Pat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux