On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 05:04 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > James Antill wrote: > > 2. There's no way to do the groupremove operation, easily. > > The groupremove operation is completely and utterly broken by design anyway: It doesn't act perfectly, in all cases, no. [...] > Try groupremoving gnome-desktop on a system with both GNOME and KDE > installed and watch it try to remove half of KDE while leaving half of GNOME > sitting there wasting space. Right, "gnome-desktop" is a typical group. Silly me. > And it just CANNOT be fixed. You mean apart from using yum from rawhide and doing: yum remove @gnome-desktop --setopt=groupremove_leaf_only=true ...or groups as objects, or... > The only (mostly) reliable way to undo a groupinstall is yum history. And > even that will only work as expected if the group was recently installed. So groupremove _has_ to do the same thing as an undo of a groupinstall to not be considered "utterly broken by design"? I guess that means plain remove is also "utterly broken by design"? Wait ... don't answer here ... if you want to troll/rant, feel free to send me personal email where I'll happily ignore it. Subjects like "yum should be faster than rpm" or "why don't we just move to apt/smart/pacman/image-packaging-system" are probably your best bang for the buck. -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "... so the consumable rawhide is likely not to get as many updates as its users would like to have." -- Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel