Re: i386-class support changed in F-13?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:54 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:43:11PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 09:13 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > 
> > > This issue points out a gap in our QA testing.
> > 
> > Indeed, although there are _many_ gaps in our QA testing, and this is
> > not news. =) We don't have the resources to test anywhere close to
> > everything. The extent of claimed CPU arch support is just one of the
> > things we're not equipped to test...
> > 
> > (It does kind of surprise me that _no-one_ at OLPC managed to notice
> > this before release, though. We do betas!)
> 
> The bug report was there one week before the announcement of the beta:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838

Ah. It's a shame it wasn't put up for consideration as a release
blocker. Obviously the rather peremptory response from Jakub didn't help
with that...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux