Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> If you can make everyone move away from sysv to something else, then by 
> all means I'll do my best to aid in patches, but I don't have much 
> confidence since everything that has been said about systemd has been 
> said of upstart a few years ago. Instead of reinventing the wheel time 
> and time again, there are other features that deserve attention.

Quite.  As a packager looking on from the sidelines, this discussion
leaves me wondering why I should expend my non-copious free time on
implementing upstart^H^H^Hsystemd^H^H^Hmaybe something else next year
init scripts.  I'll just stick with the tested sysv ones, thanks.

			regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux