Re: -upstart subpackage vs tranditional initscripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That would require systemd to be installed though, since otherwise
> /etc/systemd doesn't exist (or every package that wants to drop a file
> in there has to own it).
>
> I guess the directory could be added to chkconfig or even filesystem.

That's an important note for the upcoming discussion over systemd
integration.  Having filesystem own the directory seems like the
reasonable solution as part of systemd introduction...if it is decided
that systemd is meant to be removable.  That's an open question.

Currently initscripts requires upstart explicitly for example.  If the
decision is made to use systemd instead...I fully expect that systemd
will be a hard requirement for initscripts in a similar fashion to
what we have right now as part of the systemd integration feature.

And these upstart subpackages arent the only examples of upstart
native scripts. vpnc seems to have grown a native upstart script
already..with no sysinitv backup.  We are already in the rabbithole.

-jef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux