On 06/02/2010 01:49 PM, James Laska wrote: > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 10:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 06/01/2010 10:43 PM, James Laska wrote: >>> Greetings package maintainers, >>> >>> Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji >>> packages? This includes results of rpmlint [1], >> >> Unless rpmlint starts to use a massively cleaned up set of rules, its >> results are mostly noise. > > Which packages do you maintain where the output has become unmanageable? Noise is managable, but ... * Just have a look at the output rpm produces on any arbitrary packages. 90% of the output it produces is just (silly) noise. * Just have a look into most package reviews: Many of them suffer from churn on the (silly) noise rpmlint produces. That's why I consider rpmlint's current ruleset not to be suiteable for automated QA. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
