Elio Maldonado (emaldona@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Getting back to > >> (i.e., libfreebl3.so instead of libfreebl.so.3)? > > No danger of the name class I alluded for nss but we still want to preserve the names so as not to break other dependent packages. I wonder if aliases may help in any way. If we were to add, via the spec file, libfreebl.so.3 as an alias to libfreebl3.so (and similarly with libnssdmb3.so and linsoftoken3.so), would that help? I'm not sure it would really *help*, as it might cause confusion as some app would think that's the actual soname. I'm mainly curious as to the history of how the libraries ended up that way. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
