Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:53:41PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:51 PM, Dan Hor??k <dan@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Matt Domsch p????e v Po 31. 05. 2010 v 12:43 -0500:
> >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
> >> using rawhide from 2010-05-27
> >>
> And there are a number of packages of mine listed there that I have
> built fine in rawhide in the last couple of days.

that's fine and expected.  When I file bugs, I intentionally exclude
packages that have been built in rawhide since I started my run.
Unfortunately, my run takes a few days (~30 hours for the first pass,
and ~12 hours for each of the next 2 passes to try those that have
failed earlier - I'm only sending notes about those that still
remain).  I need to see about not reporting in this email those
packages that have succeeded in koji since I took my rawhide snapshot
to start with...

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | Office of the CTO
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux