On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > Depends on the criteria you use. The "with bytecode" version has better > kerning, better shapes, better flow, but is blurry (yeah, without Not just blurry, though -- awkwardly blurry. At screen resolution, in fact, I think it's pushing it to even say that the blurriness makes better shapes -- there's not enough pixels to make that work. The font has no bytecode, so it's not being hinted. > But generally, if font looks bad hinted when using BCI, it's most likely > a bug in font, but when BCI is not present we need to fall back to > autohinter, not just turn off the hinting. Absolutely. I'm not opposed to the BCI, just opposed to failing to autohint non-bytecoded glyphs when the feature is enabled. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional & Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
