Re: biorpms and FC2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:26:25AM -0400, Michael Tiemann wrote:
> /me visits http://apt.bea.ki.se/biorpms/

I have Cced the maintainer, Bent Terp (I think he is not a list
member, so please keep him in the Cc for related posts).

> Moreover, there's also a comment about a stuck dependency
> 
>         I focus on building for Fedora Core 1. Some packages are
>         available for RH8.0 and RH9 as well.  Requires freshrpms.net,
>         ATrpms, and Dag repositories.  As I depend heavily on these
>         repositories, I will not build for Fedora Core 2 until they do.
> 
> This is /precisely/ the kind of blockage I want to help resolve!

That's outdated, biorpms has an FC2 component since some time now!

We have also contemplated consolidating natural science releated rpms
in an "scirpm" repo or the like, but that idea did not fruit,
unfortunately.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgp1sBC1PR8VU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux