On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:47:13PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > > How about this: since libjpeg is picking momentum and there are > > actually people updating the code base, why not push for a > > libjpeg-turbo merge into the original ijg's code and get Fedora to > > rebase on that unique source instead? > > The problem, as I said before, is that the libjpeg upstream is not > being developed in an open manner. > Licensing is also an issue here. It's probably easier from licensing and project management perspective to merge the ijg libjpeg into libjpeg-turbo than vice versa. > I've emailed Adam Tkac to bring his attention to this thread (he's > involved with libjpeg-turbo) and hopefully he'll bring some more up to > date information about this matter. > Sounds good. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpva8jGCbaBQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
