Re: web-m and Fedora 14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kevin Kofler said the following on 05/21/2010 02:21 AM Pacific Time:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I don't see when the support lands in F-13 there couldn't be press
>> statements about it, just because it appears after the release doesn't
>> mean its not significant and isn't worth making a statement about.
>
> In fact this is a big failure of our feature process, but whenever I have
> brung this up in FESCo, the reaction of the other folks there was to
> threaten banning that kind of updates entirely. :-/
>
> <SARCASM>Yeah, wonderful idea, let's allow everyone else to advertise WebM
> support months before us</SARCASM>  just because the upstream release date
> happened to be at the worst possible point of our release cycle. :-/
>
> Adding features in updates is needed. Our feature process needs to
> accomodate this. The current process is broken.
>
>          Kevin Kofler
>

It's fine to suggest we need to do things differently, though it gets 
old and "trolly" when the message is repeated more times than is 
necessary for people to get the message.  This mailing list is NOT the 
place to lament all the times people haven't listened to you or done 
what you thought was best.

Instead of continuing to beat the same same horse you've killed a 100 
times over on this list, have you considered looking for another distro 
or community project that is more aligned with your wishes and goals?

John
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux