Re: Mono.Cecil and monodevelop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

> > As the new MD relies on a version of Mono.Cecil which is newer than the
> > version in gac is it permissible to ship MD-2.4 with this newer version?
> > The version in gac remains untouched by this new version so other
> > applications reliant on the old version will still run.
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to instead update the packaged version of
> mono.cecil and fix any older apps?

It depends is the easy answer. Quite a lot of apps rely on the old
version and to fix them may not be simple.

I personally would prefer to create a mono.cecil package by itself which
everything else sucks from...

TTFN

Paul

-- 
Biggles was quietly reading his favourite book when Algy burst through
the door. Distracted for a moment, Biggles surveyed what had happened
and turned a page. "Algy old man" he said, clearing his throat, "use the
handle next time..." - Taken from "Biggles combs his Hair"

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux