Re: ImageMagick update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





2010/5/16 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

About ABI breakage there separate problem in ImageMagick - http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg736218.html
So, upstream is not carefully there and I never can't guarantee what there no ABI breakage in any update...

P.S. It seams it does not hit list, i post mail again. It is reason such big delay...

--
 
Normally, if the update is a pure bugfix release,  it's safe to update and don't need a rebuild, and you should update them on rawhide as well as stable branches to fix bugs
 
If API/ABI is changed, only the following packages need a rebuild. Packages depends on ImageMagick itself actually don't need a rebuild even the API is changed.
repoquery --repoid=rawhide --whatrequires --alldeps ImageMagick-c++
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
ImageMagick-c++-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
inkscape-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.x86_64
gdl-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64
pfstools-imgmagick-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64
drawtiming-0:0.7.1-1.1.fc14.x86_64
pfstools-0:1.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64
ImageMagick-c++-devel-0:6.6.0.2-8.fc14.i686
k3d-0:0.8.0.1-1.fc14.x86_64
gdl-python-0:0.9-0.12.rc4.fc14.x86_64
inkscape-view-0:0.48-0.2.20100505bzr.fc14.x86_64
 
BTW, some subpackages contain .la files, you should remove them in %install.
e.g.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1858222
 
Regards,
Chen Lei
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux