Re: no compat-libstdc++ in development?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 07:10:01PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>     I noticed that while FC2 contains a copy of compat-libstdc++
> (7.4.2-2.96.126) that the current development RPMS are missing this.
> Is this change slated for FC3 and RHEL 4? I still have legacy binaries
> here that require compat-libstdc++ making this change most unwanted.

FC3 has compat-libstdc++-8-3.3.4.1, which contains the 2.96-RH libstdc++.so
as well as GCC 3.3 libstdc++.so.
You cannot compile new programs with 2.96-RH though, which is done on
purpose.  FC3 is going to contain compat-gcc (GCC 3.3.4, hopefully with a
switch for GCC 3.2 binary compatibility), gcc (GCC 3.4.[12]) and gcc35
(preview of GCC trunk, which ought to be binary compatible with 3.4.[12]).
Shipping more compilers is just insane.

	Jakub



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux