On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:29 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On 05/11/2010 01:14 AM, James Antill wrote: > > Thankfully all the giant flamewars and new policies didn't make anyone > > think twice about the users, as we already have 140 updates with a > > combined size of _over_ 750MB on x86_64, biggest 5 are: > > > > 6.2M wesnoth-1.8.1-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm > > 12M hanazono-fonts-20100222-2.fc13.noarch.rpm > > 48M xmoto-0.5.3-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm > > 260M wesnoth-data-1.8.1-1.fc13.noarch.rpm > > 318M openarena-0.8.5-1.fc13.noarch.rpm > > > > ...the last being particularly "nice", in that the package hasn't been > > updated for almost a year but now we get 2 300MB+ presents at once. > > Welcome to the new Fedora updates, much like the old Fedora updates. > > Hey, at least Kevin should be happy. > > > > > Speaking as the wesnoth and xmoto maintainer, I've, in the past, asked > for wesnoth releases of this nature to be tagged into final to same > mirror space, but, again, it's not in the default spin Wesnoth was annoying, but at least it is consistent as you seem to do an update about once a month. > , and we now have > deltarpms (and a huge thank to to all responsible there), so I really > don't think it's that big of an issue. As I said in another reply, there are currently no deltarpms for wesnoth-data due to it's size. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
