On 05/11/2010 05:48 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 11/05/10 15:47, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 05/11/2010 04:21 PM, Paul Howarth wrote: >>> Author: pghmcfc >>> >>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6 >>> In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12558/EL-6 >>> >>> Modified Files: >>> perl-Date-Simple.spec >>> Log Message: >>> Minor clean-ups >>> >>> >>> Index: perl-Date-Simple.spec >>> =================================================================== >>> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Date-Simple/EL-6/perl-Date-Simple.spec,v >>> retrieving revision 1.13 >>> retrieving revision 1.14 >>> diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14 >>> --- perl-Date-Simple.spec 26 Jul 2009 05:33:20 -0000 1.13 >>> +++ perl-Date-Simple.spec 11 May 2010 14:21:45 -0000 1.14 >> >>> -* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release >>> Engineering<rel-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 3.03-2 >>> +* Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release >>> Engineering<rel-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 3.03-2 >>> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild >> >> What are you trying to achieve? > > Just making the changelog format consistent within the spec file. > >> I am not aware of any rule mandating "<email> version". >> Conversely, Fedora has been using<email> - "version" for ages. >> cf. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines > > I know; the "-" is optional. > >> That said, IMO, all your changes do is rendering diffs between different >> distros less readable. > > True, at the expense of a slight readability improvement (IMHO) in the > current spec. Stylisic bikesheding, without benefits. > Shouldn't be a problem going forward though, and if I push an update > for an older release, that'll get the same changes too, which will > help with the diffs. Consider all my packages to be "off-limits"/"taboo" for you. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
