This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply to this email or add it to the related meeting page. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = Weekly KDE Summary = Week: 19/2010 Time: 2010-05-11 14:00 UTC Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-11 Meeting minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-05-11/kde-sig.2010-05-11-14.02.html Meeting log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-11/kde- sig.2010-05-11-14.02.log.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = Participants = * Jaroslav Reznik * Kevin Kofler * Rex Dieter * Steven Parrish * Than Ngo * Thomas Janssen * Lukas Tinkl ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = Agenda = * topics to discuss: o Default install paths for apidocs o Duplicate menu entries, e.g. #591089: + Do we consider these bugs? + Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream has them? + If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or only in new releases? + Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider these release blockers. o KDE SC 4.4.3 status * recent bugs: o (none) = Summary = KDE SC 4.4.3 status * kde-l10n needs respin and build * ACTION: ltinkl to respin and build kde-l10n and to prepare Bodhi update Duplicate menu entries * See [1], [2], [3] o Do we consider these bugs? o Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream has them? o If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or only in new releases? o Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider these release blockers. * AGREED: on Kevin Kofler's proposal - report upstream, follow upstream's decision, don't treat it as a release blocker Default install paths for apidocs * we are inconsistent in apidocs directories naming and location o soprano contains version, some apidocs are installed in doc/lib- apidocs/, some doc/HTML/en/lib-apidocs o we need consistent naming and common install location + AGREED: apidocs not to be installed to version specific directories + AGREED: on adapting to KDevelop needs, rdieter to check it * final decision postponed to next meeting ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = Next Meeting = http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-18 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- = Links = [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591089 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591093 [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591097 -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
