Re: Fedora 13 continuing the tradition of being an update monster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:18:23 +0200,
  Emmanuel Seyman <emmanuel.seyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> * Richard Hughes [11/05/2010 11:05] :
> >
> > I wonder what the number is for packages on the desktop spin? I guess
> > that's a bit more reasonable.
> 
> I'm left wondering what problem we're trying to solve here. I'm gussing
> it's one of :

A bad experience if you install or update from an earlier release with
the updates repository enabled.

In this case I don't think it is that bad because most of the space is
from packages that aren't in the default spin.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux